Sunday, March 6, 2016

PLEASE, NO MORE PLANS FOR THE JEWS - MARCH 6, 2016

Every Tom, Dick and Harry has a plan of the week for the Jews.

Published: Sunday, March 06, 2016 9:38 AM

Please, no more plans for the Jews.


Please don’t send me your plans for the Jews. There have been enough plans. I know all about plans. I was once part of a plan. So was my sister. So was my entire family. So were millions of families. People always had plans for us and still do. Spare me your bright ideas.



I know all about plans. I was once part of a plan. So was my sister. So was my entire family. So were millions of families.
Like the one that came this morning, from Montreal, full of bells and whistles.


He is Jewish, this writer. He writes for a somewhat pro-Israel newspaper; I mean he is generally on my side. So he had a brainstorm and he wrote about it and would I please give my opinion. It was about the “West Bank” and how to redistribute Area’s A, B and C. Or maybe just Area C.


I never got to read it, this plan, because every week someone has a plan and this week’s plan is always better than last week’s plan.


On top of that here comes Dennis Ross along with Facebook friend David Makovsky to boost their latest plan “to revive the peace process.” Would I please read their not-to-be missed big idea as revealed in The Washington Post? No thanks…and you must be kidding when you say not enough attention has been paid to the conflict.


Seriously, wasn’t it two weeks ago when you two guys teamed up for the same newspaper with another plan, or was it the same plan but with a cherry on top? Or am I thinking of Tom Friedman over there at the Times and his plan of the week?  Every Tom, Dick and Harry has a plan of the week for the Jews.

They come from the left. The come from the right. But as I warned in this book every plan is a metaphor that ends in a trap for the Jewish State.


Something happens to me when I hear about plans for the Jews. It gets worse when I hear plans for Areas, or Zones, like A, B, C, or D or X, Y, Z. Immediately my mind shifts to the Berlin suburb of Wannsee where, January 20, 1942, Hitler’s highest officials gathered for the Wannsee Conference.

They had a plan.


The man in charge was Reinhard Heydrich of the SS, no one you’d want to know, and there were more like him gathered around a big table and there was no talk of murdering the Jews. No, it was all quite civil on the topic for a “final solution to the Jewish question.”


Notice the code. Notice the metaphor. Today we know what “final solution” really means. Back then it was simply business.


The business was how to “distribute” the Jews. They had in mind 11 million of us. The atmosphere was entirely business-like. There was scant mention or no mention of death camps, gas chambers, crematoriums, or Zyclon B. Mostly these were plans to round up the Jews.


The conference was about transferring Jews from here to there, from this Area to that Area, from Area A to Area B to Area C and on up to Area Z.


Think of your local Zoning Board.


Mostly it was about train schedules…”transports” and train schedules.

The meeting was so professional that you have to read the transcripts very carefully to find any derogatory remarks about the Jews.


There was hardly a note of anti-Semitism in the room.


The men were being entirely methodical about their final solution to the Jewish question. Methodically, much of what they said was done.


Six million Jews were methodically slaughtered according to plan.

Now I am not saying that today’s men and women with a plan have the same plan in mind. Many Arabs do. Many Europeans have it in mind.


The BDS crowds surely have it in mind. That’s what their movement is all about.

My Jewish friends with a plan SURELY mean well. But it still means “transporting” the Jews and “distributing” the Jews, even within their own homeland.


Foolishly, I assumed that once the Jewish State became sovereign there’d be no more plans, other than Biblical proprietorship over the entire Land.


To me, a plan still means code, still means metaphor, still means a final solution to the Jewish question…and it gives me the creeps.

Friday, March 4, 2016

THE OSCARS 2016, A JOYLESS, PAINFUL GUILT-FEST - MARCH 1, 2016

Once the Oscars were about glamour and stardom.

Published: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 7:59 AM

Some people won, some people lost, but Sunday’s Oscars were mostly about guilt, which is why shrieking Chris Rock was the perfect host.


He was perfect if you like feeling terrible about yourself.


He’s black and you’re not and that was enough for him to keep rubbing it in.  He never let up.


He took up the anti-police “Black Lives Matter” taunt 48 hours after Virginia Police Officer Ashley Guindon was killed on her first day of duty.



I don’t go to enough movies. Is this racism? Islamophobia?
In comedy, timing is supposed to be everything.


Yes, black performers were given no heed for this year’s awards. This should not have happened. African-American talent deserves better. But does that make Hollywood “racist?” Over the years there’ve been quite a number of awards and nominations for black talent, as anyone can find on Google.


Life is unfair and that goes for everyone. Were Italians fairly represented? Sylvester Stallone lost. Asians? Greeks? Irish-Americans? Were Jews given a break?


But nothing works these days without a gripe or a cause. It’s never enough. Nobody’s satisfied. People all over feel shortchanged, which is why millions gravitate to the casinos. As I expressed it in “Indecent Proposal,” we feel cheated by life and temptation drives us beyond limits to get even.

Sunday’s Oscars were about in-your-face getting even.


So, okay. Okay! I get it and I’m sorry. It’s my fault that Will Smith didn’t get nominated. I take full responsibility.


I’m sorry about global warming, too, Leonardo DiCaprio. I apologize and won’t let it happen again.


We thank the Academy for reminding us that we are slackers. We promise to mend our wicked wicked ways for next year’s Oscars especially if Chris Rock’s number comes up again. We need to make him happy. Late word has it that this year’s telecast dipped six percent in the ratings. This too must be racism, no?


More guilt? You bet.


Like that man said, the man who ran up to accept the Oscar for something or other – we are not doing enough for gay equality.


Count me in as guilty here, too. I’m sorry and won’t let it happen again.


Years ago the Oscars were about glamour and stardom. I don’t remember them as being a joyless, painful guilt-fest.


DiCaprio, accepting for Best Actor, warned that if we don’t do something about global warming right this minute the planet is doomed. This was around midnight when he said that and…and OMG! Was I supposed to get a good night’s sleep after hearing this?


If you are not Stephen Spielberg, is there any hope?


I mention Spielberg because that is practically the only name I know anymore. What happened to Gable and Lombard, Bogart and Bacall?


These new people, I don’t know them and I feel guilty about that, too. I don’t go to enough movies. Is this racism? Islamophobia?


“We didn’t need dialogue,” lamented Norma Desmond in Sunset Boulevard. “We had faces.”

These days, as for me, I hardly know the faces and most of the time I don’t even know the names of these morning glories. This is my fault, for sure.


Anything else to feel terrible about after Sunday night’s Guilt Bash? Yes! Good movies, the small ones, get no chance, no shot. Only the studio ones budgeted at $250 million, where things fly and go bang all over the place and tell no story – these make it to the big screen.


Too bad, then, for Laszlo Nemes. This Hungarian director won for a movie that tells a story, a story about the Holocaust.


“Son of Saul,” nabbed the Oscar for Best Foreign Language and from all accounts it is a very fine film – which nobody will see.


We should all feel guilty about this, especially. 

Sunday, February 28, 2016

WORRY ABOUT YOUR OWN BACKYARD, DAVID CAMERON - FEBRUARY 28, 2015

The temper tantrum that revealed the truth about the UK PM.

Published: Sunday, February 28, 2016 12:13 PM


Wow! That was some temper tantrum, Mr. Cameron, and we can’t help but notice that your first name mirrors the Hebrew king who anointed Jerusalem.

That was 3,000 years ago when Jerusalem was consecrated for the Jewish people onto eternity, through David. Please read your bible, Mr. Cameron. Read it in the original, the Hebrew, though the King James Version would serve to make the same case in favor of Israel.

What has changed to make you breathe fire against your namesake, against Israel, against the Jewish people?

Apparently someone got to you, namely Shawan Jabarin from Ramallah who’s been murmuring that Jerusalem is becoming too Jewish.

He says, “Since Israel's annexation of East Jerusalem in 1967, it had implemented a comprehensive policy to deepen its control over the city by weakening Palestinian presence and ties there” -- and now even you say this and I ask, what exactly is the problem with Jews finally returning to their ancestral home?

Arthur James Balfour would ask you the same question. I doubt that Lord Balfour would view with favor your outburst as when last week you told the House of Commons that you found it “genuinely shocking” how “occupied East Jerusalem” is being encircled by “illegal settlements.”

Occupied? Illegal? We expect such delusions, myths and blood libels from Ramallah. But not from London.

You told your House, “I am well-known as being a strong friend of Israel.”

No you are not. Not in my house.

The phrase “occupied Jerusalem,” so wrong, so hurtful, brings with it terrible mischief among allies and disharmony among friends as you will read here when entire newsrooms, from the BBC to the Manhattan Independent squared off in revolt as to which side to take upon a fact settled through scripture and tradition.

You continued, “It’s very important that this capital city is maintained in the way that it was in the past.”

A moment ago we discussed Jerusalem and how it was in the past. Under King David is how it was in the past, followed by generations of Hebrew kings who shared his bloodlines. That is how it was and precisely how it is. Note this as well: No “Palestinian presence” in sight from one millennium to the next.

Suddenly here they are, since 1964, a people that materialized through fiction, and it all belongs to them?

That you buy an argument so false is one problem. But since we are dealing with “facts on the ground” here’s the big question:

Why are you even speaking about Israel, pro or con? Why is Israel your business? You have enough to worry about in your own backyard.

We hear no “genuinely shocking” indignation from you as regards the rape epidemic sweeping your country.

Just today six of these Rotherham gangsters were brought to justice as reported by The Independent. (UK)


Why are you even speaking about Israel, pro or con? Why is Israel your business? You have enough to worry about in your own backyard.
But generally your government and your news media are guilty of a colossal cover up. Since you are so alert to anything illegal, we would have expected you to drop Israel as an obsession, but obsess rather on an issue that demands your immediate attention, as we finally learned from one report as follows:

“The scale of the abuse in Oxfordshire, a county in southeast England, mirrors similarly shocking accounts of the sexual exploitation of white British girls by Muslim gangs in Bristol, Derby, Rochdale, Rotherham and Telford, and implies that the problem is not isolated, but endemic.”

Yes, British girls are being raped throughout your country. People are afraid to speak up for fear of being termed islamophobic – plus the fear of retaliatory abuse from the same gangs who stalk your cities, towns and villages and do so under the cover of a nationwide conspiracy of silence.

It would be different if these victims, thousands of them, had someone to plead their cause. The British prime minister would be the perfect man.

But you, sir, are busy with Israel and your concern for the Palestinians, who apparently are nearer to your heart than your own citizens and children.

Now that…yes that is genuinely shocking.
 

Wednesday, February 24, 2016

STILL WAITING FOR PALESTINIANS TO BECOME CIVILIZED - FEBRUARY 24, 2016

Hatred is what they do and it is all they do.

Published: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 9:04 PM

I write this as we learn that another Israeli has been killed as the result of the latest Palestinian terror attack, this time in Gush Etzion.


Nothing seems to stop this. Nothing seems to work. Israel has tried everything to turn these people into good neighbors, and it only gets worse.


Along with the rocks and the knives on the local scene, the Palestinian Arabs have moved their terrorism onto global warfare.

The mosques continue to blare incitement nonstop. The Palestinian-BDS movement continues to spread hatred from campus to campus, for hatred is what they do and it is all they do.


These people make nothing, invent nothing, contribute nothing. A bogus claim is all they’ve got. They are good at spreading it thick and thin.


Montreal’s McGill University is the latest to swallow from their cup of deceit.

London Tube trains carry BDS posters to further the Palestinian Arab cause, which is to murder as many Jews as possible in Israel and around the world.


On top of all that, behold, it’s Universal Apartheid Week, yet another gift to the world from the people who can’t seem to get the hang of acting civilized.


This is a global jihad, ladies and gentlemen. The last to figure this out are the Israelis, who should be the first.


It’s Global Jihad, stupid.
Because it was in Israel where this worldwide plague got started and can’t seem to get finished despite extended favors.


We are talking about concessions up the hilt…building freezes, handshakes with Arafat and Abbas over a suicidal two-state solution, lopsided prisoner exchanges, the Gaza Expulsion of Israelis, and worst of all perhaps, the Oslo Accords, where Israel’s leadership helped create this monster.


The wheeling and dealing was all done with one purpose in mind – the hope that one day the Palestinians would be appeased enough to become civilized.


One fine day, it was hoped, these Palestinian Arab Muslims would stop behaving like savages.


The dream persists, evidence to the contrary. Last week yet another high-ranking member of Israel’s military offered defeatism as his advice –


More concessions. He wasn’t kidding.


Some people simply do not learn and it is tempting to blame the Left, only it is Benjamin Netanyahu who continues to freeze Jewish territory. It was Ariel Sharon who committed the Gaza atrocity. So Israel submits itself and belittles itself from within, and from Left to Right.


Does anyone in Israel know what’s really going on outside in the big world? It’s Global Jihad, stupid.


They are everywhere, these jihadists. They are targeting everyone. They can’t be tamed and no amount of knee-bending will make a damn bit of difference.


Israel gets picked on because it is there, because it is Jewish, and because it fights with one hand and never goes for the knockout. Never.


After today’s Gush Etzion attack, which took the life of Eliyav Gelman, a Reserve Captain, 30, father of two, we are sure to weep, to grieve, to hear calls for vengeance, and to rest assured that everything is being done to catch the terrorists and bring them to justice.


Sorry – too late. Everything should have been done BEFORE, not AFTER.


Like what? Like what I have been writing for years – zero tolerance.


That is something I shouldn’t have to figure out for the politicians and for the military high brass. They should know what to do.


A nation that was outgunned 1,000 to one back in 1948 but still prevailed ought to know how to prevail against the knives of 2016.


But the beginning of wisdom for this type of warfare is to understand that this enemy cannot be softened through concession trophies in Israel or anywhere else around the world. No, it’s time to realize that this truly is a clash of civilizations, made worse by the fact that the other side is totally uncivilized.


Deal with it now and take no prisoners.

Saturday, February 20, 2016

ISRAEL AT THE MOVIES--THE PLOT THICKENS - FEBRUARY 19, 2016

Even Hollywood is more simpatico to Israel than Israel is to Israel, so far as movie making, which isn’t saying much.

Published: Friday, February 19, 2016 1:00 PM

I can’t remember the last time I saw an Arab-made movie that disparaged the Arabs. That’s because there was no first time.


If, after all, someone dared to get it done, the film surely got cut to shreds, along with the actors, producers, and the director.


This much is certain; no such film was ever made with funds provided by the government, any Arab government.


Which takes us to some place else altogether, namely Israel. Not quite Hollywood or Bollywood, but they do make movies, some good ones, but as Arutz Sheva columnist Tzvi Fishman reminds us, a lopsided number of Israeli films made by Israelis are anti-Israel.


No other country does this to itself.


No other government says to its filmmaking community, “Here’s the money. Now go make a movie that makes us look bad.”


Which appears to be how it works in Israel when the Left controls the Arts. I can’t amplify on Fishman.

He’s a rabbi who knows the screen trade very well from a highly successful career as a Hollywood scriptwriter. I’ve been a huge fan of his journalism; love his torpedo approach to the craft. Readhim. He spills the beans.


I have frequently asked if Leon Uris’s “Exodus” would get a major studio’s green light today and the answer is no.
As for me, I’ve had my Hollywood moments as an observer and as a participant and I can say that even Hollywood is more simpatico to Israel than Israel is to Israel, so far as movie making, which isn’t saying much, but it’s something. Fishman asks (my paraphrasing), When was the last time you saw a film that featured Israel in an idealized or heroic light?


Never, is what I can say. I can also say that artists who blast their own people in words or in pictures operate from a type of insanity.


To be honest, I can’t say that I have watched enough Israeli-made films to qualify as an authority. I trust Fishman.


I also trust my own instinct. When I hear about something new coming out from Israel to a theater near me, I know what’s coming. Another bashing. Another portrayal of Jews as the heavies. This is so 95 percent of the time, or so it seems. I did enjoy the Talmudic father/son drama “Footnotes.”


But is there a DeMille anywhere in the house to think in epic proportions? I ask this about Israel and Hollywood. Imagine a movie that presents the heroes of the Hebrew Bible as true to the Hebrew Bible. Imagine a movie that presents the glory of modern-day Israel in war and peace.


Frankly I can’t. Not today. I have frequently asked if Leon Uris’s “Exodus” would get a major studio’s green light today and the answer is no.


Neither would DeMille’s “The Ten Commandments” stand a chance. For all its flaws, the movie did make it clear that the subject was Moses and the Hebrews.


Not so when, years ago, ABC-TV decided DeMille (or even G-d) wasn’t good enough, so the network produced its new and improved version – only there was no mention of Moses or the Hebrews. All that was ethnically cleansed out so that we heard that someone, a “leader” was bringing his “people” to some place. End of story.


Whitewashing, when not bashing, appears to be the trend to write Jews out of the past and the present, Israel (the Left) and Hollywood equally to blame.

ABC-TV is back at it again. This time the network is planning a program on King David, as part of its

“Gods and Prophets” series.


Oy vey is all I can say about that!


On the topic in general, I hear you say – come on, it’s only a movie. Well, movies, big and small, can make a difference.


All movies are propaganda…even if they simply change how we dress, the slang we use, the people we separate from heroes to villains.


People think this way when Israel is shown in all its glory, and people think that way when Israel is portrayed darkly. The influence is undeniable.


Particularly so when documentaries are on tap.


PBS did a “Frontline” overview of terrorism. You are thinking Islamic terrorism, right? No, it was about “the settlers.” The two-hour program searched for Jewish terrorists and found none except one, a man who tried some funny business but failed; he failed as a terrorist and he failed as a neighbor. No Israeli wanted anything to do with him.


But the program aired. All Israel was tainted and painted with one brush over a single individual. Meanwhile, on PBS Islamic terrorism does not exist.


How many viewers were influenced by this? I say plenty. If we say the news media is largely responsible for much of the anti-Semitism sweeping the world, well, film, this too is a medium, equally influential and similarly dangerous when shared with millions from the wrong hands.


In the right hands, like Pierre Rehov’s “Silent Exodus” we learn the true story about the million-plus Jews evicted from their homes in Arab lands.


Rehov, a French-Israeli, is a valiant battle-tested documentarian. He’s made a number of one-the-spot documentaries frequently from behind enemy lines. But raising the money has been a tough sell for a “right wing” point of view. Somehow he has managed to get it done, and done so very well.


From others – where are you? Where’s the movie about the gutsy reinvigorated nation that could?

Against all odds! What a story!


In Israel, and often in America, the money and the laurels go to the Zionist scoffers and the moral equivalency boys.


That is a pity – and particularly in Israel, there is something wrong with this plot.

Monday, February 15, 2016

TEN RULES FOR CRUSHING BDS TERRORISTS - FEBRUARY 15, 2016

Don’t engage. Don’t discuss. Don’t debate. There is no reasoning with savages. They want to hear from you, but only to shout you down.

Published: Monday, February 15, 2016 12:03 PM

First let’s understand what we ‘re talking about. We are talking about thugs who learned their tactics from the Brown Shirts of yesteryear -- the means to disrupt, intimidate, bully and terrorize.


Back then they spoke mostly German. Today they speak mostly Arabic even if it’s in English.


The target? The Jews. Anybody else? Nobody else.


Think Kristallnacht (the infamous Night of Breaking Glass) – except on a daily basis, not just one night – and focused on every business imaginable, and the campuses.

Nearly every college and university in the United States has them, and has them ready to “break glass” and riot against anything Jewish or Israeli.


Mostly a Muslim phenomenon, some Christians and even some Jews have signed on. You know who you are and shame on you.


The movement, it is said, began in 2005. Partly correct. More accurately, it begin in 1965 when Ted Kennedy and Lyndon Johnson pushed through an immigration act that for the first time limited these immigrants, people familiar with Judeo/Christian values (Europeans), in favor of those immigrants, people coming from lands where it’s sharia or die.


This is the result.


Instead of assimilated youngsters, we have a generation processed through ancient Jew-hatred, many of them professional agitators, bought and paid for by Saudi Arabia and similar countries that spend billions to buy influence within one university to the next, including the Ivy Leagues.


The bullying is organized and non-stop. Jewish students are suffering. A group of them, readers of my books and columns, asked for a meeting and we met. They were energized, they said, by a particular story of mine in “Escape From Mount Moriah.” They pointed to the four-page essay, “A Jewish Soldier.” (Chapter 17.)


Was it true? Did it really happen? Can one incident really turn everything around and transform weaklings into fighters and winners?


Of course it’s true. It’s a memoir. It happened in Montreal. But it can happen anywhere and end just as well.


So we talked and over a period of days agreed on a call to action based on “A Jewish Soldier.” (A close second was “The Purple Gang.” Chapter 10.)


We are calling it “The One Bully at a Time Principle.”  As follows:


1. Jewish students at UCLA got it right. Finally! BDS threw a party, but Jewish students didn’t show up. The student government passed a resolution to boycott the Jewish State but was in turn boycotted. The snub left the boycotters jabbering and hi-fiving among themselves, leaving no doubt that their designs are totally one-sided and illegitimate,



When one of theirs gets up to speak, disrupt, jeer, heckle, shout him down. Let them know how it feels.
2 Don’t engage. Don’t discuss. Don’t debate. There is no reasoning with savages. They want to hear from you, but only to shout you down.


3. Keep in mind that these BDS types are not “fellow students.” They are trained specialists. You will never win the argument through talk.


4. Win the argument through action. Do keep clear of them when you can. But when the opportunity arises, use their tactics – only double.


5. When one of theirs gets up to speak, disrupt, jeer, heckle, shout him down. Let them know how it feels.


6. Not Jewish, you say? Yes it is. Read your Bible. We were never meant to be pushovers. Israel did not win its many wars by rolling over. Moreover it’s a Krav Maga maneuver. Use your opponent’s strength against him and for your own benefit. Use whatever is at hand to defend yourself in a street fight. (Isn’t that what this is?) Anything goes for the sake of winning. There are no limits.


7. Learn self-defense. Judo, karate, most certainly Krav Maga, the Israeli/IDF method. Toughen up.


8. Don’t scatter your power. Focus on one institution, one individual at a time. Send the message. That’s how we did it that one day in Montreal.


9. Pick the toughest college, the place where BDS terrorism is most heated. Today this appears to be Vassar. Go there in numbers. Bully back!


Cause a ruckus they’ll never forget. (Stop being Nice Jewish Boys. This is not cute or funny anymore. It has become harmful.)


How to get this organized? Don’t ask me. You’re smart. You’ll figure it out.


10. Pick the toughest kid. That’s how we did it when our toughest kid (Doodie) picked their toughest kid, beat him up, and the rest went running for their lives. Our streets were never completely safe even after that, but MUCH safer than before. Our French Canadian tormentors now had to think twice before starting anything.


I understand. We’re asking Jewish kids to act differently. But this is war and we are all in it together whether we like it or not.


Turn to your Hebrew Scriptures, go to the Book of Exodus, read the last phrase from the chapter Beshalach, and be amazed. (I sure was.)


Read – “G-d maintains a war against Amalek from generation to generation.”


So on it goes. Be prepared for a lengthy battle. Each of us must do his part. But look Who is on our side.

Friday, February 12, 2016

STOPPING BERNIE: WHERE ARE THE ANTI-SEMITES WHEN WE NEED THEM? - FEBRUARY 11, 2016

 Bernie is not harmless, he is dangerous, and for more reasons than one.

Published: Thursday, February 11, 2016 9:40 AM

Seriously? Yes, seriously. After trouncing Hillary in New Hampshire, Bernie Sanders could go all the way – even to the White House.


Never thought I’d say that, but there it is, kids, and speaking of kids, 84 percent of the Youth Vote went to Bernie.


College kids love him, which makes no sense. Do they know he’s Jewish?


From the Campus Front Lines we have it that our universities are turning out a generation of anti-Semites, due to an infiltration, a plague, an infestation of brutes sent over from Arab lands… Yes, BDS, SJP or whatever else they call themselves to make life miserable for Jewish students.


So with that many of the non-Jewish (and some Jewish) young infected with the virus – how to explain their love for Bernie?


Or are we mistaken? It’s really not that bad for Jewish kids on campus. Oh but it is. It’s terrible. I’ve just met a few sophomores and seniors. We talked.



Bernie is mostly anti-Israel, and that makes him cool.
Later I will disclose some possible solutions we arrived at to combat the terror on campus, but meanwhile there’s Bernie.


They’re all in for Bernie despite everything. He’s Jewish but among anti-Semites it’s okay to be Jewish so long as you are not too Jewish.


Bernie is mostly anti-Israel, and that makes him cool. He boycotted Bibi’s address to Congress, is for splitting Israel in half and against supplying the Jewish State with needed weaponry. Did you hear? In his 50-minute New Hampshire victory speech he paused from politics for a personal touch.


He said that he was brought up by parents who came from Poland, period. So he was raised by Polish parents. Not Jewish. Necessarily.


Please notice that campus bullies never target Polish students. So Bernie left it at that and the kids kept cheering.


Do they know anything else about him? Well, he is not Hillary and between you and me, that could be his big secret. Nobody likes Hillary.


It is no secret however that he is a socialist, which makes him a Communist. I am still catching raves and flak from what I wrote about all this in a recent column. But I repeat that this country cannot afford another Democrat in the White House, neither Hillary nor Bernie.


Do they love Bernie because he appears to be a harmless old man? Socialists are never harmless, old or young.


Obama is young and look what he did to us.


Do they love Bernie because he intends give everything away for free, even college tuition?

Kids adore that kind of talk. Kids tend to be Liberal. Later they will be asked to pay 90 percent of their incomes for taxes. (Bernie says so.)


Meanwhile they are young, young and in love, in love with Bernie.


No, appearances to the country, Bernie is not harmless. Bernie is dangerous.


So are all those 1960s Radicals who aim to bring back some of that old time religion, Liberal Dogma, the hazards of which we covered in thisthriller that foretold the damage being done to our young through professorial, political and cultural indoctrination. That is why the kids know nothing. They sure don’t know socialism.


People who love the idea of a Jewish President – do you know what you are asking?  His first job will be to prove how un-Jewish he can be. Think Kissinger.


If you think Israel is in the doghouse now with President Obama, just wait for President Sanders.


When he makes a mistake, as Presidents always do, he won’t be a liberal anymore. He won’t be Polish. He will be a Jew.


If by chance he shows any sign of favoritism for the Jewish State, be prepared for anti-Semites to come storming out of the closet.


Better, I say, to have them show their true colors now, or better yet, disperse and disappear.

Rather now than later, when it will be too late.