Showing posts with label Exodus. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Exodus. Show all posts

Saturday, February 20, 2016

ISRAEL AT THE MOVIES--THE PLOT THICKENS - FEBRUARY 19, 2016

Even Hollywood is more simpatico to Israel than Israel is to Israel, so far as movie making, which isn’t saying much.

Published: Friday, February 19, 2016 1:00 PM

I can’t remember the last time I saw an Arab-made movie that disparaged the Arabs. That’s because there was no first time.


If, after all, someone dared to get it done, the film surely got cut to shreds, along with the actors, producers, and the director.


This much is certain; no such film was ever made with funds provided by the government, any Arab government.


Which takes us to some place else altogether, namely Israel. Not quite Hollywood or Bollywood, but they do make movies, some good ones, but as Arutz Sheva columnist Tzvi Fishman reminds us, a lopsided number of Israeli films made by Israelis are anti-Israel.


No other country does this to itself.


No other government says to its filmmaking community, “Here’s the money. Now go make a movie that makes us look bad.”


Which appears to be how it works in Israel when the Left controls the Arts. I can’t amplify on Fishman.

He’s a rabbi who knows the screen trade very well from a highly successful career as a Hollywood scriptwriter. I’ve been a huge fan of his journalism; love his torpedo approach to the craft. Readhim. He spills the beans.


I have frequently asked if Leon Uris’s “Exodus” would get a major studio’s green light today and the answer is no.
As for me, I’ve had my Hollywood moments as an observer and as a participant and I can say that even Hollywood is more simpatico to Israel than Israel is to Israel, so far as movie making, which isn’t saying much, but it’s something. Fishman asks (my paraphrasing), When was the last time you saw a film that featured Israel in an idealized or heroic light?


Never, is what I can say. I can also say that artists who blast their own people in words or in pictures operate from a type of insanity.


To be honest, I can’t say that I have watched enough Israeli-made films to qualify as an authority. I trust Fishman.


I also trust my own instinct. When I hear about something new coming out from Israel to a theater near me, I know what’s coming. Another bashing. Another portrayal of Jews as the heavies. This is so 95 percent of the time, or so it seems. I did enjoy the Talmudic father/son drama “Footnotes.”


But is there a DeMille anywhere in the house to think in epic proportions? I ask this about Israel and Hollywood. Imagine a movie that presents the heroes of the Hebrew Bible as true to the Hebrew Bible. Imagine a movie that presents the glory of modern-day Israel in war and peace.


Frankly I can’t. Not today. I have frequently asked if Leon Uris’s “Exodus” would get a major studio’s green light today and the answer is no.


Neither would DeMille’s “The Ten Commandments” stand a chance. For all its flaws, the movie did make it clear that the subject was Moses and the Hebrews.


Not so when, years ago, ABC-TV decided DeMille (or even G-d) wasn’t good enough, so the network produced its new and improved version – only there was no mention of Moses or the Hebrews. All that was ethnically cleansed out so that we heard that someone, a “leader” was bringing his “people” to some place. End of story.


Whitewashing, when not bashing, appears to be the trend to write Jews out of the past and the present, Israel (the Left) and Hollywood equally to blame.

ABC-TV is back at it again. This time the network is planning a program on King David, as part of its

“Gods and Prophets” series.


Oy vey is all I can say about that!


On the topic in general, I hear you say – come on, it’s only a movie. Well, movies, big and small, can make a difference.


All movies are propaganda…even if they simply change how we dress, the slang we use, the people we separate from heroes to villains.


People think this way when Israel is shown in all its glory, and people think that way when Israel is portrayed darkly. The influence is undeniable.


Particularly so when documentaries are on tap.


PBS did a “Frontline” overview of terrorism. You are thinking Islamic terrorism, right? No, it was about “the settlers.” The two-hour program searched for Jewish terrorists and found none except one, a man who tried some funny business but failed; he failed as a terrorist and he failed as a neighbor. No Israeli wanted anything to do with him.


But the program aired. All Israel was tainted and painted with one brush over a single individual. Meanwhile, on PBS Islamic terrorism does not exist.


How many viewers were influenced by this? I say plenty. If we say the news media is largely responsible for much of the anti-Semitism sweeping the world, well, film, this too is a medium, equally influential and similarly dangerous when shared with millions from the wrong hands.


In the right hands, like Pierre Rehov’s “Silent Exodus” we learn the true story about the million-plus Jews evicted from their homes in Arab lands.


Rehov, a French-Israeli, is a valiant battle-tested documentarian. He’s made a number of one-the-spot documentaries frequently from behind enemy lines. But raising the money has been a tough sell for a “right wing” point of view. Somehow he has managed to get it done, and done so very well.


From others – where are you? Where’s the movie about the gutsy reinvigorated nation that could?

Against all odds! What a story!


In Israel, and often in America, the money and the laurels go to the Zionist scoffers and the moral equivalency boys.


That is a pity – and particularly in Israel, there is something wrong with this plot.

Thursday, August 20, 2015

THROW BACK THURSDAY - SPIELBERG IS NO FRIEND TO ISRAEL - DECEMBER 5, 2005

You never want to be labeled a fan of Israel in today’s Hollywood
Jack Engelhard - Ynet News  December 5, 2005

It remains to be seen, literally, if Steven Spielberg has switched sides, from kosher ("Schindler's List"), to treyf. His movie, "Munich," will be opening in a few days and early word has it that he has indeed gone "Hollywood." This means that he's joined the trend to the Left, and that's the way to go if you want to do lunch in that town again.

If advance screenings prove accurate (the movie is set to open December 23), Spielberg has used the Olympic Massacre of 1972 to send a message that brings to mind the words of MGM tycoon Louis B. Mayer: "Movies are for entertainment. If you want to send a message, send a telegram."

Regardless, Spielberg's message is that the bad guys who murdered 11 Israelis are not all that bad, and that the Israeli secret services that pursued the killers, the good guys, are not all that good. They're troubled by second thoughts. There isn't much difference, according to Spielberg's telegram, between killers and avengers.

Observers of our culture may conclude that Spielberg has bought an even bigger script than the one at hand, featuring moral equivalency as a sub-title.

No doubt Spielberg is serious, and that's the problem. People aren't buying popcorn as much as they used to and altogether box office numbers are down. People want to laugh, or cry. They don't want to be sold. I know this from experience. I still get questions about "Indecent Proposal." Why did I let Hollywood make those changes?

Well, when you sell a novel to Hollywood it's gone with the wind. Hemingway suggested that we (writers) throw our novels over the Hollywood border, grab the money and run. That's more or less what I did.

The interior voice of my novel - "what would you do for a million dollars – would you sell your wife for a night?" - was the Arab-Israeli conflict, mostly on the side of Israel. For Paramount Pictures, that was too much of a message, so they made changes, and guess what, I agree.

What about Exodus?

Or rather, I agreed then, not so much now. For some time I've asked this question - would Leon Uris get "Exodus" to the screen in this climate? I keep coming up with the same answer. No! Things have changed and not only for movies but for books as well. Again, personal experience, as with my latest, "The Bathsheba Deadline," that's running as a serial on Amazon.com. Lucky for me that Amazon.com came along, the largest of them all put together.

But not so fast. The novel was turned down by a dozen New York publishers for being too pro USA and much too Jewish, too pro-Israel. One top publisher said it plainly, or half plainly: "I really got caught up in your novel; enjoyed it very much; powerful stuff. But I will not make an offer, and I think you know why."

Yes, I knew why and I know why.

Don't look at me. A thousand other writers of my persuasion have had similar brush-offs from New York and Hollywood. Tom Clancy writes a novel that features Arabs as the bad guys, but Hollywood, for reasons of sensitivity or box office, conveniently changes these villains to neo-Nazis. "The Sum of all Fears" may well have been titled "The Fear of all Sums."

French-Israeli filmmaker Pierre Rehov travels deep into jihad territory, exposes the universe that indulges and glorifies terrorism, and he's been getting some attention, but he is struggling to find a major distributor for his eye-opening documentaries.

Spielberg has no such problems, first because he's Spielberg, and second, in the case of "Munich," he's produced a baby that Barbra Streisand, Vanessa Redgrave and Oliver Stone could love - and these people can do lunch in Hollywood any time they want, and maybe that's what it's all about.

Telegrams should go back and forth

In Hollywood today, where David is Goliath and Goliath is David, you never want to be labeled a conservative or a fan of Israel. Hollywood is all about being trendy and Israel is not the trend. You won't get invited to the right parties and you won't win any Oscars if your heart bleeds for a nation that is always on the verge of being wiped off the map.

My problem? If Uris could not get "Exodus" funded in an atmosphere that still reeks of "Durban" (and where is the movie about all that, Steve?) then Spielberg should not be green-lighted for "Munich." Sure, Hollywood, go ahead, make your day. Show us their side of the story, but what about our side?

Where is the counterpoint? If you are trending toward political themes, yes, that is your right, but where is our Right, in which decidedly I mean the Right side of politics that has us walking with a target on our backs, meaning those of us who differ on moral equivalency and other trends?

Jews pioneered Hollywood. If, as our enemies say, we own Hollywood, well, here's the plot twist - we have lost Hollywood, and we have lost Spielberg. Spielberg is no friend of Israel. Spielberg is no friend of truth. His "Munich" may just as well have been scripted by George Galloway.

Yes, Hollywood, send a telegram, but, to communicate and to get the message fair and straight, telegrams should go back and forth.

Jack Engelhard is the author of the bestselling novel and movie "Indecent Proposal"


Sunday, August 2, 2015

IRAB NUKE DEAL – OBAMA PITCHES HOLLYWOOD BOX OFFICE POISON - JULY 30, 2015

Not so long ago when I was there in Hollywood to discuss another movie, I asked a producer when the town would finally open its eyes to Islamic terrorism. Where’s that movie? The man was quick with his answer: “When a bomb hits Paramount studios, that’s when.”

At this rate, that real-life drama could be coming soon enough to Hollywood and to a theater near you.
How do you sell a lousy script that’s been passed around from producer to producer with no buyer in sight?

The wording is unintelligible. The scenario is unfathomable. The characters are disreputable.
Where’s the box office for this clunker that’s being peddled as the Iran Nuke Deal?

But even the most despicable screenplay can be justified when the biggest tycoon sits in Washington and is named Barack Obama. He gets what he wants. He wants this baby sold. It did not take much arm-twisting to get Morgan Freeman and Jack Black to start a Yes campaign for this flop.

We can expect long lines hailing and heiling this upcoming disaster flick because the Boss says do as I say.

Some in Hollywood see the Iran Deal for what it is, a danger to the business, the town, the nation and the entire world. They want it stopped. It’s doubtful they will get as many signatures as Morgan 
Freeman’s Vote Yes petition. Maybe a handful of Hollywood’s elite will vote No, Thanks. We have enough Special Effects. We do not need actual bombs.
Jon Voight, Clint Eastwood and we should expect Kirk Douglas and Michael Douglas to declare No, not in my name.

Where’s the box office for this clunker that’s being peddled as the Iran Nuke Deal?
Anybody else? Streisand? Spielberg? Not likely. Neither them nor the thousands who do lunch at Spago.

But hear this: When Hollywood flew off to Canada for the Toronto Film Festival, something else happened. The Festival honored the Israeli art of film making and sooner than you can say Danny Glover, amovement got started to boycott Israeli films and since that was so easy – why not boycott Israel altogether?

Moguls, producers, directors, actors – within an hour more than a thousand were in line behind Jane Fonda to sign the petition denouncing the Jewish State.
So this is not your father’s Hollywood. There was a time when the “Rat Pack” were kings and Frank Sinatra was Boss and Israel was in style.

Yesterday’s “Exodus” in the steady hands of Otto Preminger became today’s “Munich” in the fearful hands of Steven Spielberg.

Preminger boldly produced a movie with a strong pro-Israel theme – taken from Leon Uris.

Spielberg gave us lame and despicable moral equivalency – taken from Tony Kushner’s anti-Israel screenplay, for which, back then, I wrote this: “In Hollywood today, where David is Goliath and Goliath is David, you never want to be labeled a conservative or a fan of Israel.

“Hollywood is all about being trendy and Israel is not the trend.

“You won't get invited to the right parties and you won't win any Oscars if your heart bleeds for a nation that is always on the verge of being wiped off the map.”

Plus this: “Jews pioneered Hollywood. If, as our enemies say, we own Hollywood, well, here's the plot twist - we have lost Hollywood.”

To make sure that his Iran Deal gets a green light, John Kerry has already warned the Jewish people that they will be blamed if the deal goes down.

That is an ancient blood libel and if he is seeking frightened people to back his ungodly cause, he knows Hollywood is the place.

New York-based novelist Jack Engelhard writes a regular column for Arutz Sheva. Website: www.jackengelhard.com

Thursday, July 2, 2015

WE HEAR YOU, MICHAEL DOUGLAS - JUNE 15, 2015

WE HEAR YOU, MICHAEL DOUGLAS

Michael Douglas, in Israel to receive the Genesis Prize, needs no introduction. He is big enough and famous enough to take care of himself.

But something happened. Not to him, but to his son, Dylan, and that’s when it really hurts.
Somewhere in Europe, as Douglas described it for the LA Times, 14-year-old Dylan came crying to his father about a verbal attack that took place at a swimming pool. A man took note of Dylan’s Star of 
David and proceeded to launch an anti-Semitic tirade.

Imagine the pain. This happened last summer and still today, Douglas is worked up with indignation.
He says something must be done about anti-Semitism. Agreed. He says this can only happen in Europe. Here I totally disagree.

Try making “Exodus” today. Let me know how it goes. Good luck.

First of all, there is plenty of that going around within the United States, if we dare come to terms with what’s really happening along our campuses.

Second, we need voices exactly like that, like those of the Hollywood rich and famous, people like Michael Douglas, to speak up, yes, to denounce anti-Semitism – but it is not enough to be against something. That gets you nowhere. More important is to be FOR something, and to be for Israel would be a good place to start.

Immediately another Douglas comes to mind – Kirk Douglas, Michael’s dad. If any Hollywood actor needs no introduction, this is the man, and what a man. Thank goodness we still have him with us at 98 years old. He is the final link to Hollywood’s Golden Age – and he is a Zionist.

He was a Zionist when everybody was a Zionist – and damn how times have changed!
Back in 1960, Otto Preminger gave us “Exodus” starring Paul Newman and Eva Marie Saint. Let’s not quibble about the details. This was a Zionist film. Hollywood was not afraid to make it and there were no boycotts against the film, or against Israel.

Did I already say times have changed? Try making “Exodus” today. Let me know how it goes. Good luck.

The mood was so different back then because Israel was presented as a romance, a love story between a Land and its people.

That’s the theme of every Hollywood movie…boy gets girls, boy loses girl, boy wins girl back.

The Jewish people get Israel (Biblically), lose Israel, win her back. What a story, and back in the 1950s and 1960s it was a story that could be told, and nobody told it better, in 1966, than Kirk Douglas in “Cast A Giant Shadow.” This film gave it all, the pioneering spirit of the early founders, told with facts and emotion.

Who else was in that terrific movie? Frank Sinatra. Only Herzl himself was more of a Zionist than the Italian Kid from Hoboken. Sinatra's profound dedication to Israel was at a time when Israel was popular -- and why was it popular?

Because we had people like Sinatra and Kirk Douglas and Marlon Brandoand John Wayne…and so many others who stood tall for Israel.

To stand for Israel is different from standing against anti-Semitism. People – especially the young – need a cause.

Against something is not a cause. For something is a cause.

At some point, from the 1960s forward, the mood changed. It’s for another time to discuss what happened and how it happened and why it happened – though for me, it started right after the 1973 War when Israel woke up late and a perceived weakness gave the anti-Semites an opening.

But that’s too simplistic. Radical Liberalism was on the move and it’s still moving and as we have learned to our dismay, Radical Liberalism and anti-Semitism – this is a marriage made in hell. In short, we lost the voices, the big voices, the glamour voices that speak for Israel.

Jon Voigt, bless him, yes, and who else?

That something like 80 percent of the Jewish vote went for Obama twice, that tells you something.

That Barbra Streisand and her Hollywood claque keep funding-raising for Obama, that tells us something maybe even bigger.

In America, pop culture IS culture, and when Israel can find only one or two friends within the Hollywood elite, somebody else must step up.

Let it be Michael Douglas.

Or let it be David Mamet. This Pulitzer Prize winner is our foremost playwright and a top-notch screenwriter. One day he decided that enough was enough. He quit toying with the façade of being “a brain-dead Liberal” and announced himself squarely as a Conservative and staunchly on the side of Israel. He lost friends. You should have heard the geshrei in The New York Times.

Nobody said it would be easy. These are tough days and tough times to be Jewish, and it’s even tougher to be pro-Israel.

We can’t wait for an end to anti-Semitism. This will always be with us. But for a start to reinvigorate Jewish pride, Jewish muscle, there is only this…
Love of Zion.

Let’s hear it expressed resolutely from voices that count – while we still have a voice. Yes, before it’s too late.

Novelist Jack Engelhard wrote the international bestseller “IndecentProposal” that was translated into more than 22 languages and turned into a Paramount motion picture starring Robert Redford and Demi Moore. His latest work is “The Bathsheba Deadline.” Website:www.jackengelhard.com
This article first appeared in the monthly magazi